Nxnnx chart Moldova sex chat

Com- ments must be received within 90 days after the Federal Register notice of availability. and their Water Quality 19 Beneficial Use Designations Table 2-2 - Vegetation Types in Washington County, Utah 22 Table 2-3 - Summary of Classifications and Withdrawals 35 Table 2-4 - Wilderness Study Areas and Wilderness Area in the DRA 38 Table 2-5 - Grazing Summary 1986 51 Table 2-6 - Ongoing and Incompleted HMP Objectives 54 Table 2-7 - Wildlife Forage Allocation by Allotment 55 Table 2-8 - Washington County Personal Income and Earnings From Mining . .68 Table 2-9 - Estimated Economic Values of Recreation on Utah Public Lands - 1987 72 Table 3-1 - Summary of Alternatives 85 Table 3-2 - Land Disposals 96 Table 3-3 - Land Disposals 115 Table 3-4 - Instream Flow Needs 130 Table 3-5 - Land Disposals 152 vn List of Figures Page 1-1 Dixie Resource Area Land Ownership 2 2-1 Critical Soils 14 2-2 Water Resources 16 2-3 Riparian Habitat 18 2-4 Riparian Area Along the Santa Clara River 20 2-5 Fluid Mineral Potential 24 2-6 Oil and Gas Leasing Categories 27 2-7 Locatable Mineral Potential 28 2-8 Saleable Mineral Potential 30 2-9 Major Rights-of-Way 33 2-10 Wilderness and Wilderness Study Areas 39 2-11 Visual Resources Inventory Classes 41 2-12 Anasazi Excavation 47 2-13 Rock Art 48 2-14 Big Game Habitat 57 2-15 T&E Species 58 2-16 Sensitive Species 59 2-17 Forestry and Plant Products 61 2-18 Washington County Population Projections 65 2-19 Washington County Employment Trends 66 2-20 Washington County Per Capita Income 67 3-1 Land Disposal - Alternative A 95 3-2 Off Road Vehicle Designation - Alternative A 102 3-3 Oil and Gas Leasing Categories - Alternative B 109 3-4 Designated Utility Corridors - Alternative B Ill 3-5 Potential Land Disposals - Alternative B 113 3-6 Potential Land Acquisition - Alternative B 114 3-7 Potential Easements - Alternative B 120 3-8 Proposed ACECs - Alternative B 123 3-9 VRM Classes - Alternative B 124 3-10 Proposed Red Mountain Scenic ACEC - Alternative B 125 3-11 Proposed Canaan Mountain Scenic ACEC - Alternative B 126 3-12 Proposed SRMA - Alternative B 127 3-13 0RV Designation - Alternative B 129 3-14 Instream Flow Needs - Alternative B 132 3-15 Fluid Mineral Leasing Categories - Alternative C 147 3-16 ACECs - Alternative C 148 3-17 Potential Land Disposals - Alternative C 151 3-18 VRM - Alternative C 156 vm CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose and Need The Virgin River Management Framework Plan (MFP) encompassing the Dixie Resource Area (DRA) was completed in 1977 in conjunction with the Hot Desert Grazing Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

For Further Information contact: David Brine Bureau of Land Management Dixie Resource Area 225 North Bluff St. George, Utah 84770 n TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1 1 Introduction 1 Purpose and Need 1 Geographic Setting 3 The Planning Process 3 Issues & Criteria 5 Planning Issues 5 Issues to Be Addressed in the Dixie RMP 6 Planning Criteria 7 General Criteria (Parameters) 7 CHAPTER 2 12 Description of Affected Environment 12 Air Quality 12 Climate 12 Soils 13 Water 15 Riparian Areas 19 Vegetation 20 Fluid Minerals 22 Reasonable Foreseeable Development Scenerio 26 Fluid Mineral Leasing Categories 27 Locatable Minerals 27 Saleable Minerals 29 Rights-of-Way 31 Withdrawal and Classification 32 Lands 35 Wilderness Resources 37 Visual Resources 40 Recreation Resources 42 Cultural Resources 45 Grazing Management 48 Wildlife and Threatened and Endangered Species 53 Forestry 60 Hazardous Waste Management 60 Fire 60 Socioeconomics 63 Special Management 72 CHAPTER 3 74 Alternatives 74 Introduction 74 Alternative A (No Action) 74 Alternative B 74 Alternative C (Preferred) 76 m Management Common to All Alternatives 77 Fluid Minerals 78 Mineral Materials 78 Mining Law Administration 78 Rights-of-Way 79 Lands 79 Withdrawal Processing and Review 80 Forest Management 81 Grazing Management 81 Cultural Resource Management 81 Wilderness Management 81 Recreation Resources Management 81 Soil, Water and Air Management 82 Wildlife Habitat Management 83 Endangered Species Management 83 Fire Management 83 Hazardous Waste Management 83 Transportation 84 Socioeconomics 84 Riparian Area Management 84 Summary of Alternatives and Impacts 85 Alternative A 92 Fluid Minerals Recommendations 92 Mineral Materials Recommendations 92 Locatable Minerals Recommendations 93 Rights-of-Way Recommendations 93 Lands Recommendations 93 Withdrawal and Classification Recommendations 98 Forestry Recommendations 99 Grazing Management Recommendations 99 Cultural Resources Recommendations 99 Wilderness Recommendations 100 Visual Recommendations 100 Recreation Resources Management Recommendations 100 Soil-Water-Air-Riparian Recommendations 103 Wildlife Recommendations 105 Threatened and Endangered Animals Recommendations 106 Threatened and Endangered Plant Recommendations 106 Alternative B 107 Fluid Minerals Recommendations 107 Mineral Materials Recommendations 108 Locatable Minerals Recommendations 110 Rights-of-Way Recommendations 110 Lands Recommendations 112 Withdrawal and Classification Recommendations 119 Forestry Recommendations 119 Grazing Management Recommendations 121 Cultural Resources Recommendations 122 Wilderness Recommendations 122 Visual Resources 122 Recreation Resources Management Recommendations 126 Soil-Water-Air-Riparian Recommendations 130 Wildlife Recommendations 137 IV Page Threatened and Endangered Animals Recommendations 139 Threatened and Endangered Plant Recommendations 140 Preliminary Prescriptions Common to All ACECs 142 Alternative C 145 Fluid Minerals Recommendations 146 Mineral Materials Recommendations 149 Locatable Minerals Recommendations 149 Rights-of-Way Recommendations 150 Lands Recommendations 150 Withdrawal and Classification Recommendations 154 Forestry Recommendations 154 Grazing Management Recommendations 154 Cultural Resources Recommendations 155 Wilderness Recommendations 155 Visual Resources 155 Recreation Resources Management Recommendations 155 Soil -Water-Air-Riparian Recommendations 157 Wildlife Recommendations 157 Threatened and Endangered Animals Recommendations 157 Threatened and Endangered Plant Recommendations 158 CHAPTER 4 159 Environmental Consequences 159 Introduction 159 Alternative A - Impacts 160 Fluid Mineral 160 Minerals (Saleable) 160 Minerals (Locatable) 161 Rights-of-Way 161 Lands 163 Withdrawal and Classification 164 Forestry 164 Grazing Management 165 Cultural 165 Visual 165 Recreation Resources 166 Soil, Water and Air 167 Riparian 167 Wildlife and Threatened and Endangered Species 168 Summary A 171 Alternative B - Impacts 172 Minerals Fluids 172 Minerals (Saleable) 173 Minerals (Locatable) 173 Rights-of-Way 173 Page Lands 175 Withdrawals and Classifications 176 Forestry 176 Grazing 176 Cultural 177 Visual Resources 177 Recreation Resources 178 Soil, Water, Air 180 Riparian 181 Wildlife and Threatened and Endangered Species 182 Summary B 186 Alternative C - Impacts 188 Fluid Minerals 188 Mineral Materials 189 Minerals (Locatable) 189 Rights-of-Way 189 Lands 189 Withdrawal and Classification 190 Forestry 190 Grazing Management 191 Cultural 191 Visual Resources 191 Recreation Resources 192 Soil, Water, Air, Riparian 192 Wildlife and Threatened and Endangered Species 192 Summary C 193 CHAPTER 5 195 Public Participation 195 Key Events Dixie RMP 195 Planning Consistency 197 Consultation and Coordination 198 Distribution 198 List of Preparers 201 APPENDIX 202 Planning Team Nominations for ACEC Consideration 202 Land Disposal Legal Descriptions Table 204 Lands Identified for Acquisition 220 Description of Recreation Opportunity Spectrum Classes 226 List of Acronyms 228 Implementation and Monitoring (preferred Alternative C) 229 Glossary 235 References 242 VI LIST OF MAPS FOUND IN MAP POCKET Map of Dixie Resource Area Land Status Map of Dixie Resource Area Alternative A Map of Dixie Resource Area Alternative B Map of Dixie Resource Area Alternative C Map of Dixie Resource Area Off Road Vehicle Designations and Transportation Map - Alternative C LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1-1 - Number of Acres - Federal, State, Private in Washington County . However, litigation regarding the grazing decisions prevented final approval until 1981.

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the proposed Dixie Resource Plan is submitted for your review and comment.

Copies of the final EIS will be sent to all those who provide comments on the draft EIS or request a copy. David Brine Bureau of Land Management Dixie Resource Area 225 North Bluff St. ACECs and recreation management areas are also recommended. Comments: Comments on this document are requested from all interested and/or affected agencies, organizations, and individuals.The State of Utah Department of Natural Resources recently completed (1986) their Dixie General Management Plan proposing income management through sales, exchanges and leasing for 44,653 acres they manage near Washington County growth centers and a Virgin River Basin Study (headed by the Soil Conservation Service) is in progress for the County.It was timely to initiate the Resource Management Planning (RMP) process for Bureau lands in FY1987 to provide BLM with current resource analysis and a decision making document in FY1990 coordinated with the Dixie General Management Plan and county land use projections through FY2010.A review of the MFP in 1985 determined that unexpected rapid population growth in Washington County (increasing from a 1970 population of 7,097 to 39,100 in 1986) resulted in a shifting of community development patterns and unforeseen pressures on the public lands.In 1970, there were no public lands incorporated within city limits in the county.

Leave a Reply

  1. r lipp dating 08-Jan-2018 08:05

    Loneliness Can’t make you bored if you are with Eh!

  2. da brat and trina dating 20-Jul-2018 13:46

    This post is being closed because of its age, 200 comments (causing reading issues), and load problems. Does it really take forever for people to get married in Sweden?

  3. dating website scams malaysia 30-Jan-2018 06:25

    Chatrandom gay chat connects you instantly with random gay cams.