Creationist lies carbon dating Nuda chat

He asks "Is there any way that new carbon-14 atoms could possibly enter and contaminate materials which are truly ancient? First, he says some have proposed that earth's atmosphere or moving groundwater supplies new C being delivered constantly.The material would have to be replaced over and over over millions of years.De Young begins his discussion with stating that much of the coal deposits are Pennsylvanian in age, or approximately 300 million years old.Of course, he is stating this to claim that the coal should be carbon dead.The final explanation he addresses is that radioactive decay of heavy isotopes within the coal/diamond, such as uranium, create new carbon-14.He explains this away by claiming that the amount produced is 100,000 times smaller than that observed in the coal samples.Without viewing RATE's calculations, there is no way to verify their claim.Herein lies the problem with the young earth culture.

The RATE group had 12 diamond samples tested for C, with detectable amounts showing up in all samples, at a rate of about 1/3 that of the coal.For some reason, you don't hear about these, because in the end, these would invalidate their conclusion, as you will see.Therefore, the young earth scientists "found exactly what they wanted to find." De Young goes on to explain the carbon dating technique using accelerator mass spectrometry, or AMS.ATTEMPTS TO EXPLAIN TRACES OF CARBON-14 This section is the most critical to the old earth creationist.De Young tries to explain away the old earth explanations of how these traces of Carbon-14 got into the coal and diamonds.

Leave a Reply